The Campaign Builder's Guild

The Archives => The Dragon's Den (Archived) => Topic started by: Xathan on February 13, 2016, 08:08:55 PM

Title: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Xathan on February 13, 2016, 08:08:55 PM
Figured this should get it's own thread since Tavern is short...


QuoteLove of Awesome
"the way it ended"

Love of Awesome
It had really good action if i'm being honest. But they it ended is NOT Superman. That's not even Batman when you think about it.

O Senhor Leetz
I liked Man of Steel! I couldn't tell you why though...

Love of Awesome
I don't know, I'm tired of people trying to make Superman dark and gritty. It doesn't work for him. If they balance the white knight elements of Superman with the black knight elements of Batman, then I'm down.

Xathan
Seconded on that.

I really want Batman v Superman to be awesome. But then I remember man of steel. So...fingers are crossed.

Rhamnousia
Honestly, I'm just glad that their version of Lex Luthor isn't a Steve Jobs analogue.

O Senhor Leetz
I'm looking forward to Batman vs. Superman way more than I thought I would.

My big problem with Man of Steel wasn't the movie itself, although there were a few things about it that bugged me independent of what it was. However, what it was supposed to be was a superman movie, and it never really felt like Superman - and I'm not even a big fan of the character. However, Superman isn't a killer, and making him a killer in his first outing really changes...everything. Not to mention the wanton destruction of Metropolis was very out of character for him. If it had been a different character, I think I would have liked it a lot more.

That being said, it seems like 90% of Bats. Vs. Supes. is going to be with dealing from the fallout of this more brutal superman, and if it leads to Superman learning to be the hero we know he's supposed to be, I'd be willing to forgive a great deal of Man of Steel's flaws.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Rhamnousia on February 13, 2016, 08:36:22 PM
I thought the whole Kryptonian Codex backstory was way overdone and unnecessary, but at the same time, I loved the characterization of Zod and his followers as not only murderous bastards, but fairly representative of their civilization as a whole. Having Superman kill Zod ruined the entire movie and squandered every bit of goodwill I had for it. I also didn't feel an ounce of the sympathy I feel like I was supposed to for the soldiers who get ripped through like tissue paper by said Kryptonians. One of my favorite parts of Superman has always been that his authority is beyond nation-states - the magic of the character is that he is so powerful that he never has to compromise his ethics in the name of expediency.

Like I said, I enjoy the direction they seem to be taking with Lex Luthor. I can't help but wonder if casting the kid from "The Social Network" was meant to deliberately connect him to the obnoxious Mark Zuckerberg tech startup brand of egomaniacal billionaire rather than the more common turtleneck-clad Steve Jobs mogul variety. The new Batman is basically going to be fascist Iron Man and what I've heard about Wonder Woman's character doesn't sound too terribly encouraging either.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: O Senhor Leetz on February 13, 2016, 10:15:03 PM
I think part of why I did like Man of Steel was that Superman did have to compromise his ethics. Indeed, one of the reasons I don't and really haven't liked Superman is his infallibility - he's frankly boring because he always wins and never makes a mistake. While the movie far from perfect, I did enjoy seeing him struggle with his powers, hiding from the world and grappling with his responsibility in defending Earth and the often-infantile human race.

But really, the intro scene with Russel Crow Jor-El flying around on a space dinosaur while Krypton explodes was pretty, pretty, pretty cool.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Rhamnousia on February 13, 2016, 10:40:15 PM
You can make mistakes that aren't "compromise you most defining, deeply-held moral conviction." I think the key to making Superman interesting, something that virtually no Superman movie I've seen has done, is proper scope. Supe's most interesting foes are one who he either can't simply pummel into submission, either because of their influence and intellect (Lex Luthor, Braniac), their own massive physical power (Doomsday, Mogul), or combination of both (Darkseid). If I could rework the plotting of Man of Steel, I would skip a lot of the origin stuff - which pretty much everyone already knows by now - make Zod's genocidal terraforming attempt the center of the film.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: O Senhor Leetz on February 14, 2016, 12:23:17 AM
Quote from: Rhamnousia
You can make mistakes that aren't "compromise you most defining, deeply-held moral conviction." I think the key to making Superman interesting, something that virtually no Superman movie I've seen has done, is proper scope. Supe's most interesting foes are one who he either can't simply pummel into submission, either because of their influence and intellect (Lex Luthor, Braniac), their own massive physical power (Doomsday, Mogul), or combination of both (Darkseid). If I could rework the plotting of Man of Steel, I would skip a lot of the origin stuff - which pretty much everyone already knows by now - make Zod's genocidal terraforming attempt the center of the film.

Completely agree on the backstory argument - I'm a "Less is More" fan anyways. And while I do love the intro on Krypton (more for visuals than anything else) it was completely unnecessary - it was eye-candy, but coming from Zack Snyder it could have been way more oily. The rest of the plot was OK - gods and men and all that.

As much as I'm beginning to get get comic book movie fatigue, I really do love the movies that address the more mature and real-world implications that superheroes and superpowers would have, especially Captain America: The Winter Soldier (way underrated), the Thor movies in a way, and, of course, Man of Steel (maybe the post-Avengers movies like Iron Man 3, but I wish they would have gone beyond Tony Stark's own PTSD a bit more).
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Rhamnousia on February 14, 2016, 01:17:22 AM
Honestly, Sony needs to sell back the rights to the X-Men (and whatever other characters they're sitting on), DC needs to quit trying to make the next Avengers, and everyone needs to just let the two decade-long unstoppable juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe run its course before trying to make anymore superhero movies.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: O Senhor Leetz on February 14, 2016, 01:51:54 AM
Quote from: Rhamnousia
Honestly, Sony needs to sell back the rights to the X-Men (and whatever other characters they're sitting on), DC needs to quit trying to make the next Avengers, and everyone needs to just let the two decade-long unstoppable juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe run its course before trying to make anymore superhero movies.

I think it's pretty close to running its course. Unless movies like Guardians of the Galaxy (weird, off-kilter, fun) become the norm, I think Marvel will self-implode soon. Iron Man's burnt out, Spiderman's burnt out.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Rhamnousia on February 14, 2016, 02:46:37 AM
Well they're already "retired" Iron Man: he'll be in the films, of course, but Tony Stark's not getting any more movies of his own. And while I agree that Spiderman is overdone, I think the promise of a proper Marvel version will make sure that it makes the same insane profit as literally every single other movie the studio's made. Then there's Civil War, Doctor Strange, Black Panther, Thor: Ragnarok, Guardians of the Galaxy 2, multiple Avengers: Infinity Wars films (which will be directed by the Russo brothers who made CA:TWS so amazing), Captain Marvel, Ant-Man and Wasp, the Inhumans, and like three more that haven't even been named yet. I'm honestly not a Marvel fanatic, but I can't see the franchise imploding from anything less than the collapse of Western capitalism because the process is so diversified and downright weird at this point, with so many creative visions working on so many different IPs that it's yet to really seem stale. They managed to make a solid show out of Daredevil and one of the most powerful, nuanced shows ever made about the realities of trauma out of Jessica fucking Jones, and they're still planning on releasing independent Iron Fist and Luke Cage series before they all get their own big spin-off together. And Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D is probably going to keep blandly chugging along forever too...

Just from a purely-economic standpoint, Age of Ultron made enough money to fund like the next five movies entirely on its own. They're apparently going to pour something like a billion dollars into the Infinity Wars films and that's not even that big of a dent in their overall profits.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: LoA on February 14, 2016, 03:12:42 AM
Quote from: O Senhor Leetz
Quote from: Rhamnousia
Honestly, Sony needs to sell back the rights to the X-Men (and whatever other characters they're sitting on), DC needs to quit trying to make the next Avengers, and everyone needs to just let the two decade-long unstoppable juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe run its course before trying to make anymore superhero movies.

I think it's pretty close to running its course. Unless movies like Guardians of the Galaxy (weird, off-kilter, fun) become the norm, I think Marvel will self-implode soon. Iron Man's burnt out, Spiderman's burnt out.

Not meaning to be one of those people, but X-Men, and Fantastic Four are made by Fox. Spiderman is owned by Sony.

Honestly I just think it's really cool that so many obscure characters are getting movies, and it's precisely because Marvel and Disney were put in a tight place and forced to look in weird places, and lo in behold we have a space action movie about a trucker, an assassin, a raccoon, an ent, and speaking as someone on the Autism Spectrum, it's finally nice being represented in a Superhero movie. And I only need to point to Rhamni's post above to point out how successful this has been.

Speaking as a huge Captain Marvel fan, there will never, ever be a SHAZAM! movie. Never. I wish, but never gonna happen. Justice League Unlimited did a good job on this, and so did Young Justice.... You know what? Screw a SHAZAM! Movie. Give me an animated series.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: Rhamnousia on February 14, 2016, 03:34:14 AM
Yeah, I forgot who owned the rights to which characters. Honestly, I am so tired of the X-Men movies: the younger cast isn't as compelling and Peter Singer's fetish for edgy black leather uniforms is even less appealing ever since the Avengers went full-blown four-color with their designs.

I think the overwhelming excellence of the DC animated series is definitely going to harm their goals of making an Avengers-style Justice League franchise. I've already seen people leveling criticism at Suicide Squad for how awful their version of Harely Quinn is compared to the original.

I am curious where the idea of a SHAZAM movie came from tho. Unless you thought I was talking about the other Captain Marvel.
Title: Re: Batman V Superman and Man of Steel
Post by: LoA on February 14, 2016, 02:10:51 PM
Quote from: Rhamnousia
Yeah, I forgot who owned the rights to which characters. Honestly, I am so tired of the X-Men movies: the younger cast isn't as compelling and Peter Singer's fetish for edgy black leather uniforms is even less appealing ever since the Avengers went full-blown four-color with their designs.

I think the overwhelming excellence of the DC animated series is definitely going to harm their goals of making an Avengers-style Justice League franchise. I've already seen people leveling criticism at Suicide Squad for how awful their version of Harely Quinn is compared to the original.

I am curious where the idea of a SHAZAM movie came from tho. Unless you thought I was talking about the other Captain Marvel.

Yeah the Outfits in X-Men First Class where waaaayyy better.

No sorry, the point I was making with a SHAZAM! movie is that DC will never be able to make movies the way marvel does, for the simple fact that Warner Bros. owns every last scrap of the DC Universe. Green Lantern bombed hard, and therefore they probably have no incentive to ever go back and try to make movies about independent characters ever again. Justice League gives them the perfect oppurtunity to make movies about their characters... that also involve Superman and Batman. There is never going to be a movie that doesn't involve Superman and Batman. They don't have the pressure to do so like Marvel and Disney do for the simple fact that some of Marvel's biggest Cash Cows such as Spiderman, Xmen, and Fantastic Four are owned by other companies. DC has no such qualms. Batman and Robin bombs. Eh well just wait a few years, and.... OH! Batman Begins was successful! And look at that, it's follow up is quite possibly the most successful Superhero movie ever! DC has no incentive to grow with it's films. Frankly they already make the best superhero cartoons ever, managing to one up themselves with Young Justice.

And before you start saying "Suicide Squad", that's probably only happening because it has Joker in it, and he's Batman's most beloved nemesis.