• Welcome to The Campaign Builder's Guild.
 

Congrats to Dr. Steerpike!

Started by LoA, April 19, 2017, 09:29:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

LoA

Hey, I figured I'd start a thread about this, so that the tavern doesn't get clogged. Congratulations Steerpike on your Thesis and your defense of your PhD! I just wanted to ask if it would be possible to ever read your thesis, as that would be fascinating. I don't know the rules on that, but I figured there was no harm in asking. What was it like confronting educators an defending your thesis? I imagine that defending Lovecraftian Fiction from a board of Peers had to be an interesting experience.


Steerpike

#2
Thanks LoA!

It should indeed eventually be possible to read my thesis after it is uploaded to an open access repository - probably some time next week.

Defending the dissertation was indeed interesting and challenging, although fortunately they did not saddle me with any substantive revisions or rewriting, which is a possibility during these things. I take that as something of a vote of confidence for the thing's quality, and it certainly earned its share of praise at the defence, although there are a number of details that still dissatisfy me about it. I hope to eventually turn a version of the dissertation into a monograph where I can clarify and develop a few of those loose ends. Overall, though, I'm pleased and really quite proud of the work as a whole. I deal with four authors in detail - Poe, Machen, Blackwood, Lovecraft - over about 320 pages, so it's a fairly deep dive into their works, their ideas, their language, literary theory, and bits of philosophy, primarily aesthetics and metaphysics, particularly as practiced by the so-called "speculative realist" movement.

Xathan

Major congratulations, Steerpike!
AnIndex of My Work

Quote from: Sparkletwist
It's llitul and the brain, llitul and the brain, one is a genius and the other's insane
Proud Receiver of a Golden Dorito
[spoiler=SRD AND OGC AND LEGAL JUNK]UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE POST, NONE OF THE ABOVE CONTENT IS CONSIDERED OGC, EXCEPT FOR MATERIALS ALREADY MADE OGC BY PRIOR PUBLISHERS
Appendix I: Open Game License Version 1.0a
The following text is the property of Wizards of the Coast, Inc. and is Copyright 2000 Wizards of the Coast, Inc ("Wizards"). All Rights Reserved.
1. Definitions: (a)"Contributors" means the copyright and/or trademark owners who have contributed Open Game Content; (b)"Derivative Material" means copyrighted material including derivative works and translations (including into other computer languages), potation, modification, correction, addition, extension, upgrade, improvement, compilation, abridgment or other form in which an existing work may be recast, transformed or adapted; (c) "Distribute" means to reproduce, license, rent, lease, sell, broadcast, publicly display, transmit or otherwise distribute; (d)"Open Game Content" means the game mechanic and includes the methods, procedures, processes and routines to the extent such content does not embody the Product Identity and is an enhancement over the prior art and any additional content clearly identified as Open Game Content by the Contributor, and means any work covered by this License, including translations and derivative works under copyright law, but specifically excludes Product Identity. (e) "Product Identity" means product and product line names, logos and identifying marks including trade dress; artifacts; creatures characters; stories, storylines, plots, thematic elements, dialogue, incidents, language, artwork, symbols, designs, depictions, likenesses, formats, poses, concepts, themes and graphic, photographic and other visual or audio representations; names and descriptions of characters, spells, enchantments, personalities, teams, personas, likenesses and special abilities; places, locations, environments, creatures, equipment, magical or supernatural abilities or effects, logos, symbols, or graphic designs; and any other trademark or registered trademark clearly identified as Product identity by the owner of the Product Identity, and which specifically excludes the Open Game Content; (f) "Trademark" means the logos, names, mark, sign, motto, designs that are used by a Contributor to identify itself or its products or the associated products contributed to the Open Game License by the Contributor (g) "Use", "Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify, translate and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content. (h) "You" or "Your" means the licensee in terms of this agreement.
2. The License: This License applies to any Open Game Content that contains a notice indicating that the Open Game Content may only be Used under and in terms of this License. You must affix such a notice to any Open Game Content that you Use. No terms may be added to or subtracted from this License except as described by the License itself. No other terms or conditions may be applied to any Open Game Content distributed using this License.
3. Offer and Acceptance: By Using the Open Game Content You indicate Your acceptance of the terms of this License.
4. Grant and Consideration: In consideration for agreeing to use this License, the Contributors grant You a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license with the exact terms of this License to Use, the Open Game Content.
5. Representation of Authority to Contribute: If You are contributing original material as Open Game Content, You represent that Your Contributions are Your original creation and/or You have sufficient rights to grant the rights conveyed by this License.
6. Notice of License Copyright: You must update the COPYRIGHT NOTICE portion of this License to include the exact text of the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any Open Game Content You are copying, modifying or distributing, and You must add the title, the copyright date, and the copyright holder's name to the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any original Open Game Content you Distribute.
7. Use of Product Identity: You agree not to Use any Product Identity, including as an indication as to compatibility, except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of each element of that Product Identity. You agree not to indicate compatibility or co-adaptability with any Trademark or Registered Trademark in conjunction with a work containing Open Game Content except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of such Trademark or Registered Trademark. The use of any Product Identity in Open Game Content does not constitute a challenge to the ownership of that Product Identity. The owner of any Product Identity used in Open Game Content shall retain all rights, title and interest in and to that Product Identity.
8. Identification: If you distribute Open Game Content You must clearly indicate which portions of the work that you are distributing are Open Game Content.
9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License.
10 Copy of this License: You MUST include a copy of this License with every copy of the Open Game Content You Distribute.
11. Use of Contributor Credits: You may not market or advertise the Open Game Content using the name of any Contributor unless You have written permission from the Contributor to do so.
12 Inability to Comply: If it is impossible for You to comply with any of the terms of this License with respect to some or all of the Open Game Content due to statute, judicial order, or governmental regulation then You may not Use any Open Game Material so affected.
13 Termination: This License will terminate automatically if You fail to comply with all terms herein and fail to cure such breach within 30 days of becoming aware of the breach. All sublicenses shall survive the termination of this License.
14 Reformation: If any provision of this License is held to be unenforceable, such provision shall be reformed only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable.
15 COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Open Game License v 1.0 Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
Fudge 10th Anniversary Edition Copyright 2005, Grey Ghost Press, Inc.; Authors Steffan O'Sullivan and Ann Dupuis, with additional material by Jonathan Benn, Peter Bonney, Deird'Re Brooks, Reimer Behrends, Don Bisdorf, Carl Cravens, Shawn Garbett, Steven Hammond, Ed Heil, Bernard Hsiung, J.M. "Thijs" Krijger, Sedge Lewis, Shawn Lockard, Gordon McCormick, Kent Matthewson, Peter Mikelsons, Robb Neumann, Anthony Roberson, Andy Skinner, William Stoddard, Stephan Szabo, John Ughrin, Alex Weldon, Duke York, Dmitri Zagidulin
System Reference Document Copyright 2000-2003, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Authors Jonathan Tweet, Monte Cook, Skip Williams, Rich Baker, Andy Collins, David Noonan, Rich Redman, Bruce R. Cordell, based on original material by E. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson.

Modern System Reference Doument Copyright 2002, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Authors Bill Slavicsek, Jeff Grubb, Rich Redman, Charles Ryan, based on material by Jonathan Tweet, Monte Cook, Richard Baker, Peter Adkison, Bruce R. Cordell, John Tynes, Andy Collins, and JD Walker.

Unearthed Arcana Copyright 2004, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Andy Collins, Jesse Decker, David Noonan, Rich Redman.

Mutants and Masterminds Second Edition Copyright 2005, Green Ronin Publishing; Steve Kenson
Fate (Fantastic Adventures in Tabletop Entertainment) Copyright 2003 by Evil Hat Productions, LLC. Authors Robert Donoghue and Fred Hicks.
Spirit of the Century Copyright 2006 by Evil Hat Productions, LLC. Authors Robert Donoghue, Fred Hicks, and Leonard Balsera
Xathan's forum posts at http://www.thecbg.org Copyright 2006-2011, J.A. Raizman.
[/spoiler]

Rose-of-Vellum

I'll once again echo my congratulations on the twin accomplishments of completing the dissertation and then successfully defending it to your committee (and with little/insignificant revisions too)! To clarify, since different countries run things differently, did you have to write and defend both a thesis (for a master's) and then a dissertation (for your doctorate)? If so, what was the topic of your thesis (versus the above explained dissertation)?

For the rest of you, I was able to secretly tape Steerpike's defense. Enjoy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrlro3YJ15o


Steerpike

I did not write a Master's thesis - some Master's programs have them, and some don't, and I did my Master's at an institution that rather discouraged them. I did write an "Honour's Thesis" in the final year of my Bachelor's degree which is a bit shorter than a Master's thesis but of some size, and for that I wrote on the grotesque and Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray.

Rose-of-Vellum

Nice. So do you have any classes or remaining requirements before you get hooded into the PhD cabal?

Steerpike

#7
The only remaining hoop I need to jump through is getting the dissertation formatting approved by the inscrutable wardens of the institutional repository, but that should be a formality (however due to weird deadlines this might mean I attend a ceremony in a few weeks or in six months).

Here, by the way, is the dissertation's abstract:

[ic=Abstract]"The Daemonology of Unplumbed Space: Weird Fiction, Disgust, and the Aesthetics of the Unthinkable" explores the aesthetic and metaphysical significance of disgust in weird fiction. Beginning with the weird's forefather, Edgar Allan Poe, the study traces the twisted entanglement of metaphysics, aesthetics, affect, and weird fiction through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, considering along the way the myriad attempts of authors such as Arthur Machen, Algernon Blackwood, and H.P. Lovecraft to stage encounters with the unthinkable. Drawing on recent philosophical efforts to reinvigorate metaphysical thought – including speculative realism and new materialism – as well as affect theory, the dissertation argues that in contrast with earlier Gothic writers, whose focus on sublime aesthetic experience reified the importance and power of the human subject and entertained fantasies of spiritual transcendence, authors of weird fiction exploit the viscerality of disgust to confront readers with the impermanence and instability of a subject polluted by nonhuman forces which seep into it from the world around it. In doing so, weird fiction helps us to think about the nature of this queasy, nonhuman world, to glimpse an existence beyond the world merely as it appears to us. By investigating the intertwinement of the aesthetics of disgust and metaphysical speculation about the nonhuman world, the dissertation expands our understanding of weird fiction and the study of affect in literature. It thus contributes to a growing understanding of weird fiction as more than a pulp, essentially commercial genre, rather interpreting the weird as literature of ecstatic yearning for a non-anthropocentric reality, literature which dwells on questions of being, becoming, and the ultimate nature of the universe.[/ic]

I actually like how I put it in the conclusion better, where I get to let myself off the chain a bit and indulge in a less-stuffy prose style:

[ic=Wisdom of the Unhuman]This study has been an exercise in a form of weird criticism, blending together things which we might think disparate, mingling the strange aesthetics of the gross-out with metaphysical inquiry, reading pulp fiction alongside philosophy, finding something akin to the sublime or the numinous in worlds of putrescent slime and cannibal monstrosity. I have sought to articulate philosophical insights gleaned from the festering tongues of too-animate corpses or the hungry, myriad mouths of hybrid abominations – the wisdom of the unhuman.[/ic]

My external examiner referred to it as "DUS," which I quite liked.

LoA

For the record if Steerpike ever became a professor, I would gladly screw over my education to go to his college and take "Weird Fiction 101". Best non-existent course ever!

Steerpike

LoA, I know you're kidding, but as it happens I'm actually already planning to teach a version of a weird fiction course (contract faculty, not tenure-track yet). This summer I'm going to be teaching an "Approaches to Literature" course for first years - a "study of selected examples of poetry, fiction, and drama." Every instructor gets to do their own version of this course and there's a lot of leeway for choices. There's already one on the Gothic where they read Dracula and similar texts. Mine is going to be themed around the weird and will include:

Beowulf ("wyrd" fiction)
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
Shakespeare's Macbeth
Sheridan le Fanu's "Carmilla"
Stories from the Lovecraft anthology The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories
China Mieville's The City & The City

Magnus Pym

That's awesome.

But I'm curious, what do you intend to do with that kind of study, exactly? Like, it must certainly be a passion for you, but can you translate that passion into something you can earn money with? Are you going to write books, then?

Steerpike

#11
Quote from: Magnus PymBut I'm curious, what do you intend to do with that kind of study, exactly? Like, it must certainly be a passion for you, but can you translate that passion into something you can earn money with? Are you going to write books, then?

Essentially, English scholars who want to pursue a career in research are hired by universities to do a mixture of teaching and research. You're expected to publish academic articles and monographs, and, eventually, get tenured as a result. Tenure-track research jobs are hard to come by, but certainly not impossible (a friend of mine who I share an office with just got hired, for example; she works on disappointment and Romantic poetry, so we make a funny pair - disappointment and disgust). Universities hire professors and grant tenure on the basis of their research, which is where this kind of study becomes valuable, especially if I can get an academic publisher to turn it into a monograph i.e. a scholarly book. Sometimes these books can provide their own income-stream as well, but more often than not the books are primarily of interest only to students and other academics, so your salary comes not from the books directly but from the institution funding you. A lot of the time research projects are also funded by organizations like SSHRC in Canada (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council) who give out grants for scholarly research in various disciplines.

The other career route - and one I find as-or-more appealing as pursuing a research career - is to get a primarily teaching-focused career at a university or community college (I'm currently teaching courses at one of each). While tenure-track research faculty do have to teach classes, they're also being paid to research. Teaching positions just pay you to teach instead of to teach and research, but obviously they still want qualified scholars to teach literature and composition courses. Community colleges sometimes just require a Master's degree, but a PhD is an asset. Often you do still get time off and possibly some funding to do research, or even creative work. I know quite a few community college English instructors who are also poets or filmmakers or writers; two actually play in my D&D game. It seems to be a slightly less frenzied life than that of research faculty, where the "publish or perish" adage holds true. The especially good news here for English PhDs is that English is almost always a required subject at Anglophone post-secondary institutions regardless of faculty, so there's a big demand for qualified instructors. Obviously, your abilities and experience as a teacher are more important than your research talents, which is why you spend a lot of time as a TA while completing a PhD. I managed to secure work as an instructor of record in my final year of the program, which gives me a bit of a leg up on this route.

The research positions can be more prestigious but are sometimes more highly paid, but often necessitate moving to a new city. You go where the jobs are, essentially. With teaching jobs there's a better chance of getting to choose your city. You're also not pressured to publish scholarly works in the same way, even if it's encouraged and/or rewarded.

Those are the most directly obvious career paths. So, essentially, you don't usually do a PhD in English to go into business for yourself, you do a PhD in English with an eye to becoming a professor or instructor at a college or university, who want qualified experts to teach their students and perform additional research.

That said, there are a number of other things that PhDs go off and do that don't explicitly require a PhD - working for governments and private companies, often. Usually your specialization doesn't matter as much here, it's your ability to write and research and organize large projects that's valuable. Mid- to higher-level university administrators also sometimes have PhDs. I know some people who got kinda burnt-out on scholarship and found decently paying and reasonably interesting work as administrators or other non-faculty university staff.

Ideally, I'd like my career to be primarily based in some combination of teaching and research at a post-secondary institution while I pursue creative projects on the side. My idols in this regard would be authors like China Miéville (who has a PhD in international relations and teaches at the University of Warwick) and Ada Palmer (who is a professor of history at the University of Chicago), incidentally probably my two favourite living authors. J.R.R. Tolkien or C.S. Lewis would actually also be very good examples of this kind of dream-career, albeit from an earlier era - both English academics who also wrote creatively.

Rose-of-Vellum

So what you're saying is... you're going to write a book.

:D

:D

About how many publications does your field generally require for obtaining and then keeping a tenure-track position?

Hibou

[spoiler=GitHub]https://github.com/threexc[/spoiler]

Steerpike

#14
Thanks Hoers!

Quote from: Rose-of-VellumAbout how many publications does your field generally require for obtaining and then keeping a tenure-track position?

I think there's quite a bit of variation, but a book and around five articles or so is pretty common as I understand it. Single author papers are generally the norm in English.

Quote from: Rose-of-VellumSo what you're saying is... you're going to write a book.

Yeah, I'd like to turn DUS into a book, and ideally I'd like to write a sequel about the New Weird. For a book I'm thinking of adding William Hope Hodgson into the mix, and possibly some combination of MR James, Vernon Lee, and Clark Ashton Smith; for the sequel, Thomas Ligotti, China Mieville, Jeff Vandermeer, and perhaps K.J. Bishop or Clive Barker might be possible authors of interest. Alternatively I've always wanted to write something about Gormenghast, for obvious reasons, but maybe that'll be an article instead. I do plan on possibly writing some articles adapting parts of the dissertation. I've published several that weren't part of the dissertation, and presented bits of the dissertation at conferences, but not actually published any of the dissertation in journals, so I can start mining it for stuff soon.

I'll say one thing for the PhD (and I don't know if this has been your experience too, Rose) - it was hard, sure, and sometimes it was stressful, but it was frequently fun and intellectually rewarding, and while I think higher education has some serious structural problems it needs to address, I didn't have the cliche experience you sometimes hear about, where you enter graduate school and leave a penniless emotional wreck without any relevant "real-world" experience. I've occasionally read these miserable accounts of people's time in grad school, but mine really was nothing like that. Which isn't to say that grad school is for everyone, but it's also not the dystopian dead-end money-suck it's sometimes portrayed as being, or at least it wasn't for me.