The Campaign Builder's Guild

I'm so ridiculously up for this. Like, actually, massively, hugely up for it :D

well, maybe I'll finally get someone to run a Bugbear death mage.

Another thought, what with the whole playing-online-is-slow-due-to-mechanics.... Reth Jaleract is rules-neutral. I've also, coincidentally, come up with a basic rules system recently, which I designed for situations just like this - where you want to play but not worry about/get bogged down in the rules.

Needless to say, it's ridiculously simple.

So, I could run any possible Reth Jaleract online game using that, which would make play a lot more streamlined, if somewhat unrealistic due to the very simple rules.

I would definitely be interested, but I couldn't see myself joining more than one in four vignettes. (As has been stated, that's the beauty of the system!)  I would also love to run Tephra, but Tephra has a high learning curve.  It'd be awkward.  Still, I'd love to see what everyone else does!

Quote from: L to tha CI don't know about you, but I have definitely got a long list of other people's settings on this site that I'd jump at the chance to play in.

I'm actually interested in doing this with Vilydunn (The Original Nightmare version) as well as Haveneast, though the former would use multiple variant rules from UA.

Quote from: WickedTrollI'm actually interested in doing this with Vilydunn (The Original Nightmare version) as well as Haveneast, though the former would use multiple variant rules from UA.

Haveneast definitely makes my list. I don't remember much from Vilydunn, honestly, but I'd give it a look if you were running something for it.

Quotethough the former would use multiple variant rules from UA.

Required Texts[/b] ought to be listed on it.

Depending on the levels of interest, I'm not sure that this will be an impediment to getting a group together. I don't have a copy of UA, but I'm betting there's tons of folks here who do.

UA is available at www.d20srd.org under "Variant Rules". If you can remember way back to when Vilydunn was on the WotC forums, it used the Sanity mechanic, which is found under the Variant Rules > Campaigns section I think :D

Required text lists are definitely a good idea. Vilydunn can run entirely on Core + Unearthed Arcana, while Haveneast would probably require access to most of the Complete Series as well as Libris Mortis. I'm assuming there will be a large variety of game systems that people will consider using, but it may end up that D&D 3.5 and/or d20 Modern will be the systems easiest to use due to widespread familiarity - I'm sure almost everyone at the CBG is familiar with at least one, if not both of these.

Quote from: Poseidon

Quote from: Luminous CrayonYeah. I hate that the old IRC game never really got off the ground, but I really had bitten off much more than I could chew when I set that one up.

I blame Crit for being so dashing.... :P

*poof* you called? *poof*

In other news, I am interested in this, and as long as my nocturnal streak keeps up, I look forward to participating.  Hopefully LC, you run a vignette game on a time slot that I am available.  I'd love to play Sarenin again.

Can I just say, please let's not let this idea go by unused. I dunno if anyone else has been thinking about it or not, but in my mind, it's too good an idea to be simply forgotten :)

This idea sounds so awesome. I would totally love to do it and I am mIRC scripting language knowledgeable in case anyone needs certain scripts whipped up for sessions.

[blockquote=LC]So, an offhand comment in the Tavern set me to cogitating, and that's never a good thing.[/blockquote]

Every other Tuesday might turn out being possible for an online Celtricia thang.  Baby on the way might be a monkey wrench and a half.

I might continue the Ocodig setting group online.  The person heading that group says he might take on two new ones.
  Ocodig

*Kisses Vreeg's feet*

I haven't been part of a session in over a month. I am beginning to have roleplay withdrawals.

This is getting closer.

The pacing on online gaming is a little different, at least for me.  Generally, we keep one IM 'window' open for the game, and the GM keeps one extra window open per player, so as to be able to give them some info on the side if nec.  
Sometimes only a few rooms in a crawl get done in a session.  The group has to stay together, as well, so while the sep. windows make the sneaky types easier to play, they cannot really get away to do 'Bad Things' as easily.
Experience is normally given after a session.
At least that's how we do it.  Any other conventions that mnight need to be discussed?