• Welcome to The Campaign Builder's Guild.
 

Can we talk about blog hosting?

Started by Lmns Crn, March 09, 2013, 11:13:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Lmns Crn

This got brought up in the Tavern earlier in the week, and I'm wondering what the status is.

Is Steerpike's blog already in place on the site somewhere? Is there a protocol in place for others of us to request a similar blog setup upon which to Barf Forth Apocrypha?

Are there any other turtle samurai who might be interested in a little game-related blogstyles lovingly sheltered under the CBG's auspices?
I move quick: I'm gonna try my trick one last time--
you know it's possible to vaguely define my outline
when dust move in the sunshine


Seraph

Quote from: Luminous Crayon
Is there a protocol in place for others of us to request a similar blog setup upon which to Barf Forth Apocrypha?

Are there any other turtle samurai who might be interested in a little game-related blogstyles lovingly sheltered under the CBG's auspices?
Quote from: Steerpike
I would read the crap out of other CBGers blogs.
I am wondering about whether it would be cool to have a shared CBloG where we can all do this.  That might end up being the same as the ordinary forum, though.

Maybe something closer to the Wiki instead, where we can all make blogs, and have them be located at a central hub?
Brother Guillotine of Loving Wisdom
My Campaigns:
Discuss Avayevnon here at the New Discussion Thread
Discuss Cad Goleor here: Cad Goleor

Bardistry Wands on Etsy

Review Badges:
[spoiler=Award(s)]   [/spoiler]

Steerpike

I'd be against a shared blog, personally, because the CBG forums, chat, and wiki already fill that niche nicely for me - a community where collaboration and sharing, critique and communication and cross-pollination, are the point.  To me blogs are more idiosyncratic and personal.  A forum is for exchanging ideas, making stuff as a group, checking out each others' stuff.  At least for me, a blog is more of a soapbox, a platform for one person's ideas and expression (with plenty of comments and links elsewhere, of course).  There are exceptions, but that's the kind of blog I'd want, a place that is Mine rather than Ours, if that makes sense.

LordVreeg

Quote from: Luminous Crayon
This got brought up in the Tavern earlier in the week, and I'm wondering what the status is.

Is Steerpike's blog already in place on the site somewhere? Is there a protocol in place for others of us to request a similar blog setup upon which to Barf Forth Apocrypha?

Are there any other turtle samurai who might be interested in a little game-related blogstyles lovingly sheltered under the CBG's auspices?
maybe.
Likely.
...and this is where I hang my hat.
VerkonenVreeg, The Nice.Celtricia, World of Factions

Steel Island Online gaming thread
The Collegium Arcana Online Game
Old, evil, twisted, damaged, and afflicted.  Orbis non sufficit.Thread Murderer Extraordinaire, and supposedly pragmatic...\"That is my interpretation. That the same rules designed to reduce the role of the GM and to empower the player also destroyed the autonomy to create a consistent setting. And more importantly, these rules reduce the Roleplaying component of what is supposed to be a \'Fantasy Roleplaying game\' to something else\"-Vreeg

Xathan

I would totally read other CBGers blogs to no end.

As far as making my own blog...if I could come up with a solid idea, I probably would. :) Just need to work on that.
AnIndex of My Work

Quote from: Sparkletwist
It's llitul and the brain, llitul and the brain, one is a genius and the other's insane
Proud Receiver of a Golden Dorito
[spoiler=SRD AND OGC AND LEGAL JUNK]UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE POST, NONE OF THE ABOVE CONTENT IS CONSIDERED OGC, EXCEPT FOR MATERIALS ALREADY MADE OGC BY PRIOR PUBLISHERS
Appendix I: Open Game License Version 1.0a
The following text is the property of Wizards of the Coast, Inc. and is Copyright 2000 Wizards of the Coast, Inc ("Wizards"). All Rights Reserved.
1. Definitions: (a)"Contributors" means the copyright and/or trademark owners who have contributed Open Game Content; (b)"Derivative Material" means copyrighted material including derivative works and translations (including into other computer languages), potation, modification, correction, addition, extension, upgrade, improvement, compilation, abridgment or other form in which an existing work may be recast, transformed or adapted; (c) "Distribute" means to reproduce, license, rent, lease, sell, broadcast, publicly display, transmit or otherwise distribute; (d)"Open Game Content" means the game mechanic and includes the methods, procedures, processes and routines to the extent such content does not embody the Product Identity and is an enhancement over the prior art and any additional content clearly identified as Open Game Content by the Contributor, and means any work covered by this License, including translations and derivative works under copyright law, but specifically excludes Product Identity. (e) "Product Identity" means product and product line names, logos and identifying marks including trade dress; artifacts; creatures characters; stories, storylines, plots, thematic elements, dialogue, incidents, language, artwork, symbols, designs, depictions, likenesses, formats, poses, concepts, themes and graphic, photographic and other visual or audio representations; names and descriptions of characters, spells, enchantments, personalities, teams, personas, likenesses and special abilities; places, locations, environments, creatures, equipment, magical or supernatural abilities or effects, logos, symbols, or graphic designs; and any other trademark or registered trademark clearly identified as Product identity by the owner of the Product Identity, and which specifically excludes the Open Game Content; (f) "Trademark" means the logos, names, mark, sign, motto, designs that are used by a Contributor to identify itself or its products or the associated products contributed to the Open Game License by the Contributor (g) "Use", "Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify, translate and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content. (h) "You" or "Your" means the licensee in terms of this agreement.
2. The License: This License applies to any Open Game Content that contains a notice indicating that the Open Game Content may only be Used under and in terms of this License. You must affix such a notice to any Open Game Content that you Use. No terms may be added to or subtracted from this License except as described by the License itself. No other terms or conditions may be applied to any Open Game Content distributed using this License.
3. Offer and Acceptance: By Using the Open Game Content You indicate Your acceptance of the terms of this License.
4. Grant and Consideration: In consideration for agreeing to use this License, the Contributors grant You a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license with the exact terms of this License to Use, the Open Game Content.
5. Representation of Authority to Contribute: If You are contributing original material as Open Game Content, You represent that Your Contributions are Your original creation and/or You have sufficient rights to grant the rights conveyed by this License.
6. Notice of License Copyright: You must update the COPYRIGHT NOTICE portion of this License to include the exact text of the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any Open Game Content You are copying, modifying or distributing, and You must add the title, the copyright date, and the copyright holder's name to the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any original Open Game Content you Distribute.
7. Use of Product Identity: You agree not to Use any Product Identity, including as an indication as to compatibility, except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of each element of that Product Identity. You agree not to indicate compatibility or co-adaptability with any Trademark or Registered Trademark in conjunction with a work containing Open Game Content except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of such Trademark or Registered Trademark. The use of any Product Identity in Open Game Content does not constitute a challenge to the ownership of that Product Identity. The owner of any Product Identity used in Open Game Content shall retain all rights, title and interest in and to that Product Identity.
8. Identification: If you distribute Open Game Content You must clearly indicate which portions of the work that you are distributing are Open Game Content.
9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License.
10 Copy of this License: You MUST include a copy of this License with every copy of the Open Game Content You Distribute.
11. Use of Contributor Credits: You may not market or advertise the Open Game Content using the name of any Contributor unless You have written permission from the Contributor to do so.
12 Inability to Comply: If it is impossible for You to comply with any of the terms of this License with respect to some or all of the Open Game Content due to statute, judicial order, or governmental regulation then You may not Use any Open Game Material so affected.
13 Termination: This License will terminate automatically if You fail to comply with all terms herein and fail to cure such breach within 30 days of becoming aware of the breach. All sublicenses shall survive the termination of this License.
14 Reformation: If any provision of this License is held to be unenforceable, such provision shall be reformed only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable.
15 COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Open Game License v 1.0 Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
Fudge 10th Anniversary Edition Copyright 2005, Grey Ghost Press, Inc.; Authors Steffan O'Sullivan and Ann Dupuis, with additional material by Jonathan Benn, Peter Bonney, Deird'Re Brooks, Reimer Behrends, Don Bisdorf, Carl Cravens, Shawn Garbett, Steven Hammond, Ed Heil, Bernard Hsiung, J.M. "Thijs" Krijger, Sedge Lewis, Shawn Lockard, Gordon McCormick, Kent Matthewson, Peter Mikelsons, Robb Neumann, Anthony Roberson, Andy Skinner, William Stoddard, Stephan Szabo, John Ughrin, Alex Weldon, Duke York, Dmitri Zagidulin
System Reference Document Copyright 2000-2003, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Authors Jonathan Tweet, Monte Cook, Skip Williams, Rich Baker, Andy Collins, David Noonan, Rich Redman, Bruce R. Cordell, based on original material by E. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson.

Modern System Reference Doument Copyright 2002, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Authors Bill Slavicsek, Jeff Grubb, Rich Redman, Charles Ryan, based on material by Jonathan Tweet, Monte Cook, Richard Baker, Peter Adkison, Bruce R. Cordell, John Tynes, Andy Collins, and JD Walker.

Unearthed Arcana Copyright 2004, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Andy Collins, Jesse Decker, David Noonan, Rich Redman.

Mutants and Masterminds Second Edition Copyright 2005, Green Ronin Publishing; Steve Kenson
Fate (Fantastic Adventures in Tabletop Entertainment) Copyright 2003 by Evil Hat Productions, LLC. Authors Robert Donoghue and Fred Hicks.
Spirit of the Century Copyright 2006 by Evil Hat Productions, LLC. Authors Robert Donoghue, Fred Hicks, and Leonard Balsera
Xathan's forum posts at http://www.thecbg.org Copyright 2006-2011, J.A. Raizman.
[/spoiler]

sparkletwist

Personally, I'm not all that excited about the idea, but I don't want to be overly negative, because blogs written by CBGers could definitely be interesting.

I just basically agree with Steerpike's view of a blog vs. a forum and I prefer the way things work here now. In addition, if an interesting conversation starts up in a blog's comments, this is separated from the forum (unless they're integrated somehow, which I assume would be a lot more work) and kind of dilutes the total amount of content available-- if stuff starts getting spread out, we sort of lose the sense of being "one community," and we're not the largest community to begin with. If the blogs and the forum are not integrated, then, well... what's the difference between that and the people who want a blog just going and starting one on one of the many hosts designed specifically for blogging?

Of course, what actually gets done is ultimately up to the person (presumably Nomadic) who ends up actually doing that stuff. :)

Steerpike

#7
For the record, I didn't specifically introduce the idea of starting a blog linked to the CBG.  I was just asking around the CBG if people might be interested in a blog written by me, since the people here know my tastes in gaming and writing better than anyone else on the web.  Nomadic generously stepped in with the possibility of helping me set the blog up.  I think I probably will set one up, but I'm planning on buying my own domain name etc.  Nomadic may still help me out to some extent (he's pretty awesome like that, and I drew him a turtle...), but I'm not interested in running an official (or unofficial) "CBG Blog" per se (though a blog "hosted by the CBG," as it were, is fine by me).  I'm sure I'll link to the CBG and post stuff about games I'm running/playing in/reading about on the CBG, though, because they're a big part of my gaming-life.

LD

>>I think I probably will set one up, but I'm planning on buying my own domain name etc

In the unlikely event you didn't yet know this: you can get a free "steerpike.wordpress.com" account if you're uncertain whether you want to have a domain name yet. Once you have the Wordpress account, you can pay a little more to redirect to a "steerpikeblog.com", etc. Wordpress is quite easy to use. I've set up three wordpress sites and they all run swimmingly :)

And once again, I'm interested in reading your blog-thoughts.

Nomadic

Quote from: Luminous Crayon
This got brought up in the Tavern earlier in the week, and I'm wondering what the status is.

Is Steerpike's blog already in place on the site somewhere? Is there a protocol in place for others of us to request a similar blog setup upon which to Barf Forth Apocrypha?

Are there any other turtle samurai who might be interested in a little game-related blogstyles lovingly sheltered under the CBG's auspices?

No his blog is not yet up, I'm still in the planning phase with him. Hopefully we can begin work on it soon once he figures out how he wants to do this.

And while I would love to read any CBG member blogs there isn't really a protocol to set this up. I am in general agreement with steerpike and sparkletwist here. I'd really prefer to avoid a ton of blogs hosted on the server. The reasons they stated on diluting the community would certainly concern me. Additionally there is limited space on the server. While at this time that space is still quite alot I would be worried about putting in x blogs and then having member x+1 ask for their own space and be unable to get it.

I'm not totally against hosting sites for members but they would have to be unaffiliated with the cbg (simply using the server as hosting) and I'd probably request a small monthly fee to pay for hosting and any future server upgrades (such as additional drive space to avoid the problem I mentioned earlier) I'd need to do. Before I get into that I want to see how this thing goes with steerpike's blog. Think of it as a test run. I'm giving him the chance to be the first to do this because I think he's the right person to try it.

Polycarp

I don't oppose the idea, but the point is a bit lost on me.  Actually, I'm just not very accustomed to blogs - what kind of things would a blog allow you to do that you can't do in a thread?
The Clockwork Jungle (wiki | thread)
"The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way." - Marcus Aurelius

Steerpike

I'd return to my earlier comment - a forum is communal and collaborative and about the exchange of ideas.  A blog is more personal and individual and a platform for a particular individual's ideas.  When you go to a forum, you got to join in (or just read) conversations; when you to a blog you're getting a more "concentrated dose," as it were, of one person's shtick.  I think blogs are inherently kind of egotistical, in a way (because they presume that someone cares about what the author in particular wants to say), but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Seraph

So nixing the idea of everyone having blogs.  Though maybe, should it happen that members like Steerpike and anyone else who ends up wanting one does get a blog, perhaps a links page?  That would basically just be: "Some of our members have their own things going on.  Here are some links to check out their stuff!"  Though links in signatures would probably work just as well.
Brother Guillotine of Loving Wisdom
My Campaigns:
Discuss Avayevnon here at the New Discussion Thread
Discuss Cad Goleor here: Cad Goleor

Bardistry Wands on Etsy

Review Badges:
[spoiler=Award(s)]   [/spoiler]

sparkletwist

I basically agree with Steerpike's idea of what a blog is and "giving people more ways to talk exclusively about their own stuff" is not a mission statement I, personally, feel like is worth promoting here.

If Nomadic (or anyone else with hosting) feels like setting something up, I won't object, of course, but that's just my two cents on the matter.

Polycarp

Sparkletwist is probably in the right here.

Personally, I have no problem with people doing and promoting their own projects.  They can do that here, in a thread.  They can tell us in that thread about their website or blog, and if we want to, we can go read it.  There is nothing wrong with this, and I might even read such a blog, but it seems like something we should let people do on their own.

I might support this if it seemed advantageous to the site; the CBG should encourage things that bring more traffic to the CBG.  There seems to be a real concern, however, that this would do exactly the opposite by diverting our members elsewhere.  I don't know how real a problem that is but it's certainly worth thinking seriously about.
The Clockwork Jungle (wiki | thread)
"The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way." - Marcus Aurelius